What's New
Escaping the Cult
Current Trends
Bible Doctrines
Bible Explanations
Emergent church
Latter Rain
Word Faith
Popular Teachers
Pentecostal Issues
Trinity / Deity
World  Religions
New Age Movement
Book Reviews
Web Directory
Tracts for witnessing
DVD Video
Web Search
The Persecuted Church


For printing  our articles please copy the web page by highlighting  the text first - then click copy in the browser-  paste the article into a word  program on your computer. When the text is transferred into word, click to save or print.      







     The Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research IDMR

Henry Kinley states he has received possibly the greatest revelation given to man. Through a vision he remodels the interpretation of the bible in a radical new way. The Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research claims to believe the bible but they don’t trust what we have today, saying it was not preserved, and will admit it is not inerrant (without error). It  then has come under the unique interpretation of their founder Henry C. Kinley.

To their credit they teach salvation is by the Grace of Yahweh, through Faith; and not "Salvation by any Works of Righteousness," which we ourselves have done. However they have other stipulations that changes the meaning.

They teach that Salvation comes by only knowing and using the "correct" name, Yahweh and Yashua. One must study the pattern and symbolism of God's tabernacle. This Divine Pattern of the Universe was shown to Moses on Mt. Sinai, as well as to each of the prophets, and of course later revealed in a vision to their founder/prophet Henry C. Kinley 1931 in Springfield, Ohio.    

This group was incorporated in California in 1958. They are not considered a Church but a school of research. Numerous schools have been established throughout the United States and in Canada, England, Jamaica, Nassau Bahamas and Trinidad. They have branches throughout North America, Europe and other foreign countries.

Their grandiose claims of, "He challenged everyone to make him prove this fact to their own satisfaction or not to believe anything that he taught. No one has ever been able, regardless of their religious or academic background, training, etc., to disprove anything taught according to this Divine Vision and Revelation."

"I have repeatedly declared and avowed that I, Henry C. Kinley, received a Divine Vision and Revelation in the Year 1931 just as Moses, Paul and other of the Prophets and Apostles and it was one of the most Panoramic and Stupendous visions ever given unto man…. with this Divine Vision and Revelation, I received power to foretell every world-wide event and happening and to heal all manner of physical illness as a witness to the fact -that I was caught up in the THIRD HEAVEN and saw things impossible for a man to utter." (p.3 From the book Elohim the archetype (original) pattern of the universe)

Kinley states he has received possibly the greatest revelation given to man, this after the fact the Bible has been completed by the revelation given to the last apostle of Yeshua.  Heb.1 states God speaks to us today through His Son, not a new doctrine by visions. Kinley clearly puts himself into the category of a prophet like those in Scripture as well as a new Testament apostle so he should be judged in the same manner that we judge prophets (Deut 13, and 18). We find that  he does speak according to the words of the former prophets. As Isa.8.20 says "to the law and the testimony if they do not speak according to this word they have no light in them."

What makes this more interesting is that another prophet who came long before Kinley received a similar vision and now has 12 million followers, his name was Joseph Smith. Only a few months after the Book of Mormon had been published and the church organized  Joseph Smith received a revelation narrating the experience of Moses when he "was caught up into an exceeding high mountain, and he saw God face to face, and he talked with him."' This revelation ended: And now, Moses, my son, I will speak unto you concerning this earth upon which you stand; and you shall write the things which I shall speak. And in a day when the children of men shall esteem my words as naught, and take many of them from the book which you shall write, behold I will raise up another like unto you, and they shall he had again among the children of men, among even as many as shall believe.

These words were spoken unto Moses in the mount, the name of which shall not be known among the children of men. And now they are spoken unto you. Amen."

So many people have been deceived by supernatural visions not testing them in the light of New Testament revelation already revealed. So their followers are convinced to seek after the same and follow the man with the vision instead of the one whom the book speaks of Yeshua Ha Masiach (John 5:39)

Prior to receiving his Vision and Revelation Kinley was a minister in the Church of God for 15 years. After he saw the light, it "revolutionized" his whole concept about Yahweh-Elohim. Yet he knew that the world would not believe him so he prepared to demonstrate this new knowledge by using charts and illustrations from the vision he had seen and heard.

In 1961 he published God the archetype original pattern of the universe that was revealed through his vision. They believe a schematic, or blueprint was given for one to investigate the spiritual realm that Elohim is the "Original (Archetypal) Pattern of the Universe." He believes through this teaching of Elohim the Archetype Pattern of the Universe some have been raised from the Death bearing witness to the operation of the Divine Yahweh given Pattern. While the bible does have types and patterns however these are taken to the extreme or made to define clear doctrinal issues.

"As Yahweh, the Creator, was manifest in the flesh as Yahshua the Messiah … in the end of the dispensation of the Law, likewise, in the end of this dispensation of Grace, believe it or not (Hab. 1:5, Acts 13:41), He (Yahweh) is manifest in one, Dr. Henry C. Kinley, Founder of the Institute of Divine Metaphysical Research, Inc. Dr. Kinley has made it known that: by the Law and Prophets (or the Old Testament, Scriptures, Isa. 8:20) is the only way to come to a profound knowledge of what Yahshua the Messiah was doing in the days of His flesh (three and one-half years), and to know Him in the Power of His Resurrection, and this only IS ETERNAL LIFE (John 17:3)."( the clergy has failed to warn their congregations, the shepherds have failed to warn their flocks website- www.idmr.org/htdocs/clergyletter.htm) this site shows how the teaching has affected those who join. However this is the official website www.IDMR.NET 

This is very opposite of what the passage Jn.17:3 is saying, to know (by an intimate relationship) the only true God and Jesus Christ… not Mr. Kinleys interpretations or he being the Messiah. Contrary to all this "He (Yahweh) is manifest in one, Dr. Henry C. Kinley", further puts him not only in the category of a prophet, but equal to Yashua (Jesus) himself. This is with no more proof except their own rhetoric. Jesus made it absolutely clear that he would be seen coming the same way he left Acts 1:11. This is a sinful man declaring himself to be the Messiah. I find this no different than Rev. Moon or any other that is currently claiming this position. This means a false 2nd coming which Yeshua warned about, "many would come in my name, saying I am Christ in Mt.24. The saddening fact is that the followers ignore this or rationalize it away. Therefore fulfilling exactly what Yeshua said “many would follow.”

In fact by believing this his followers show that they do not believe the Bible. For it is explicit in Hebrews 9:27   To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time, apart from sin, for salvation (deliverance)." This shows the same Yeshua who died will come again (justa as Acts 1:11 says).

Hebrews 7:23-24 “Also there were many priests, because they were prevented by death from continuing. But He, because He continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood.” This is because he can never die again, but Kinley died. One should deduce from this fact alone that he was not an incarnation of Yeshua.

  Heb. 7:26 “For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens.” To die means one has the nature of a sinner. The fact is Yeshua himself said to John “I am He who lives, and was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore. Amen.”(Revelation 1:18). If you do not believe this you cannot call yourself a believer in the Bibles revelation.

A Metaphysical revelation versus a Biblical revelation from God

If you look up the word metaphysics metaphysics-  Metaphysica, title of Aristotle's treatise on the subject, fr. Gk (ta) meta (ta) physika, lit., the (works) after the physical (works); fr. its position in his collected works] : the philosophical study of the ultimate causes and underlying nature of things — metaphysical (The Merriam-Webster Dictionary) to be metaphysical actually means without material form or substance, which seems to describe what happen

How did Kinley receive his revelation? In his search for answers He " wondered how it could be that no man had seen Yahweh, yet Moses wrote of the creation as an eye-witness." He then looked to nature for the answer to be revealed . after no success He" turned to meditation upon that part of myself that was created in the image and likeness of Yahweh - Elohim about whom I wished to learn. I found then the true meaning of "Be Still and know that I am Yahweh.." I knew that I existed , and that was all. I did not exist in relation to anything I could recognize. All I could recognize was " ME." This was the part of me which was created in the image and likeness of Elohim. It was to that ME that the Creator spoke. "

He then went backward in time" There was no ME to be afraid . I had become absorbed into the Universe… The speech did not come from somewhere else; it seemed to originate from within me." He then was taken back in time before Moses entered the cloud which surrounded the top of Mt. Sinai.

This clearly is an Occultic vision and a discovery of the God from within .  Many have described this in the new age by those who meditate. The only difference is that it is shrouded in biblical imagery. Notice his inclination was toward self discovery and that he had a propensity toward this understanding already.

Kinley also teaches a pantheistic view of the world "Yes, everything is Yahweh (the Father) because everything (organic and animated) that hath breath praises his name by breathing his name; and even things so called inanimate or inorganic are made by the Divine Pattern given by God. (www.idmr.org.htdocs) This is the essence of the new age occult energies as well as Hinduism , God resides in that which he created. The bible teaches he is transcendent apart from what he created. He alone is uncreated and made everything so he is not what he made.(Gen.1:1, Jn.1:3; Heb.11:3) Kinley states he was there seeing all made in a vision, yet he denies the the record of Moses written in Genesis.

The Bible

Here's their revelation of Scripture "No! The Bible is NOT the WORD of GOD. This is not just OUR belief but the Bible itself gives testimony to this fact - in John 1:1 where it states that "In the beginning was the WORD and the WORD was with God and the WORD WAS (and still is) GOD (NOT THE BIBLE). The same was in the beginning with GOD. All things were MADE BY HIM (NOT A PHYSICAL BOOK) and without him was not anything made that was made. IN HIM (NOT THE BIBLE) is LIFE and the LIFE was (and still is) the LIGHT of Men." The bible declares itself to be what God has spoken to man throughout time and history. When it states the word was made flesh it means that all God has communicated to man, all who he is was made flesh in Jesus. I’ll give only a few examples which should be sufficient to show their error. Jesus spoke to the Pharisees about their additions to the Bible Mark 7:13 "making the word of God of no effect through your tradition which you have handed down." In rebuking the Devils temptation he quotes from Deuteronomy Luke 4:4 "But Jesus answered him, saying, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.'" Luke 5:1 "So it was, as the multitude pressed about Him to hear the word of God," This same word is written down in a book we call the Bible.

The Institute claims the Bible was not preserved, and not inerrant (without error). The Bible states that not one letter would pass away from Gods word, they are eternal Mt.5:18. The scripture claims to be pure and the absolute truth. It is this same scripture that Kinley changes the meaning to prove his own revelation.

The Ordinances of Communion and Baptism

"Dr. Kinley has also repeatedly stated and proven scripturally that all carnal ordinances (water baptism, Passover suppers, ceremonies, circumcision, Passover feasts, foot washing, etc.) practiced by Christendom today, have been erroneously carried over and misplaced in this Spiritual Dispensation and Age of Grace." The clergy has ignorantly called YAHSHUA THE MESSIAH a LIAR, in saying that He INSTITUTED rather than FULFILLED all carnal ordinances that were under the Mosaic Law (Matt. 3:13-15, Matt. 5:17-18, Luke 24:25-27, 44)."

While many of these are not required they can be observed if one desires to. The New Testament teaching does institute some of these ordinances in the age of grace, which began at the death of Christ (beginning of the new covenant.) Of course much of the Christian church teaches he fulfilled the old Testament ordinances but he Yeshua gives a New Testament ordinances.  Paul is explaining how to take the communion of the blood and body of Christ 1 Cor. 11:23-26Jesus said “For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes”(1 Cor. 11:26) IDMR asks “If the messiah rose on the third day why do this? The first point to understand is that they did not take communion through his ministry until the night before his death. The epistles instructing the communion were written years after he rose. It is about the Lord coming back again to earth a second time. “showing the lord's death till he come” The answer is contained in the context

1 Cor 11:23-25 “For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.”

Was Paul and Peter wrong and Kinley right? This makes the Scripture wrong, and shows the intent of this man who claimed to be God manifested in the flesh (and is now dead) to do away with all Christian practices commanded as doctrine and put himself at the steering wheel as a new revelator.

Let's look at what Paul means. Matthew 26:26-29: "And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to the disciples and said, "Take, eat; this is My body." Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you." For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. "But I say to you, I will not drink of this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it new with you in My Father's kingdom." (Also Mk.14:22-25, Lk.22:19-20 , 1Cor. 11:23-26).

Jesus will not partake of it with us again until the kingdom comes. But it never says this is done way with when the Apostle Paul is telling the Church how to take it. In the same way the Passover was taken for 1500 years before Yeshua, so the New Testament proclaims that we continue to take this communion (that was the Passover bread and cup) until he comes again. In the Passover they remembered this meal as the deliverance from the bondage the slavery of Egypt now Jesus applies this himself in their deliverance from the bondage of sin. We remember it by what he has done his death and we remember by looking forward to his promise of his return. 

Luke 22:19 "And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me."  Is Jesus saying to do this one time only and no more after He dies the next day. Or that it continues afterwards? The language is clear, he is saying to continue this practice. This is why Paul quotes years afterwards  " This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me”(1 Cor. 11:24).

According to the Bible it is a cup of blessing-communion -Koinonia. 1 Cor.10:16 the bread and the cup represent the true  body and the blood of the Lord.  In the Passover they remembered this meal as the deliverance from the bondage the slavery of Egypt.  Jesus now applies this to himself in their deliverance from the bondage of sin. We remember it by what He has done his death and we remember by looking forward to His promise of his return.

This means that the apostle Paul and even Jesus were wrong, as well as the Bible. The fact is Jesus told them to baptize in water AFTER His resurrection. Baptism is a New Testament ordinance that began with John as one of repentance but Jesus gave it a new meaning after his resurrection. It was Jesus that commanded the disciples to baptize ALL people in ALL nations after His resurrection. Mk.16:16; Mt.28:19; Rom.6; Mk.16:16 written many years after the Church began (as are all the gospels) states that all believers are to be baptized (not just Jewish believers). Acts 8:38 Philip baptized the eunuch in water. There is not one set of rules for Gentiles and Jews, we are one in the body as Eph.2 states, the middle wall of partition was torn down we both observe the same commands. Acts 10:47-48 Peter distinguishes two different baptism one of the spirit that the gentiles first received and the other of water. Peter did not withdraw the statement, but actually affirms what previously occurred. He states in v.47 "Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have." Yes IDMR forbids it! What is actually at stake is the authority of the Bible being replaced by a mans teaching. A man who does not want to obey the commands of the New Testament and teaches others not to. a man who the followers claim was Yeshua in the flesh (God).

Acts 16:31: the Philippian jailer (A gentile) asks what must I do to be saved? Answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, he and his household were later baptized in water. This is after Kinley unequivocally states no gentiles are to be baptized going against this scripture. Furthermore Paul in 1 Cor.1 says he didn’t come to baptize but to preach the Gospel. Yet he did baptize a few people who were gentiles, (his minisitry was to the gentiles) he did expect them to be baptized by someone. All believers are to be baptized it is a first issue command after they are saved by faith.

Multiple Incarnations

"That Yahshua the Messiah was also manifested with the children of Israel at the time of Moses as Joshua, the Son of Nun (none after the flesh, 1 Cor.10:4, Ex. 24:13, Num. 13:8, 16, Heb. 4:8, Act 7:38).

This is a good example of new revelation that reinterprets the old revelation of truth; which proves this is not the correct biblical interpretation. This is reincarnation, re-embodiment. The Bible says He (God) was manifested (made known, appeared) in the flesh 1 Tim.3:16. He incarnated only once through the virgin birth of Mary. Christ came once and died (ONLY) once. Heb.9 :26 tells us he appeared to put away sin by his sacrifice, this is in the past tense. He does not keep on reappearing in different bodies. In fact 1 Jn.4:2 tells us we are to confess "Jesus Christ has come in the flesh." Past tense, a one time event of taking up a body. He will come back in the same body and same way He left Acts 1:11.Until He comes again the only ones who will claim to be Messiah in the body are false ones (Which includes the IDMR founder). 

Joshua was certainly a man of faith but he was not perfect. He was the son of Nun, he did not have a virgin birth which would be the ONLY means the Messiah would be born into this world (Isa.7:14). He also made a bad mistake being deceived into the treaty with the Gibeonites Josh.9:3-27. Who was Joshua worshipping and taking orders from in chpt.5:13-15? To say Yashua was Joshua because of the name being the same means he was born a sinful man, because Joshua died. He lived he died but not did not die for our sins as the true priest Yeshua did! The simple fact is that it was not yet   time for him to be incarnated. Isaiah the prophet (Isa.7:14; 9:6) would come much later predicting when he would be born 700 years after. What of all the other people and priests called Joshua? What of those called Joshua today? This name identification goes much further in their theology and incorporates a confusion and legalism that is  par to none. (go to 2nd article) This is just completely absurd to anyone with even a superficial Bible understanding and should not be entertained at all as truth.

 What's most concerning is that they believe Yahshua was incarnated in Kinley last of all. This is attributing deity to  a man whom died.

They Reject a true Bodily Resurrection

 "That unless you teach that the Messiah was buried a natural man (sown a natural, 1 Cor.15:44-47), and raised a spiritual (Incorporeal), seen only by vision, you haven't understood the Kingdom of Heaven, for flesh and blood cannot inherit the Kingdom of Yahweh (1 Cor-15:50), neither doth corruption inherit incorruption."

"That unless you teach that the Messiah was seen to ascend in A VISION and (already) returned (in a cloud or spirit as He went away) on the Day of Pentecost and established His Kingdom in the Heart and Mind, instead of coming to set up a natural Kingdom on earth in the future, you are teaching DEATH and DESTRUCTION instead of ETERNAL LIFE."

" Christendom believes the Messiah arose a physical body because they cannot explain how the Messiah showed his disciples the nail prints in his feet and hands (Luke 24:36-40). They don't realize that this was a vision being shown to the disciples, although the disciples were not conscious that they were seeing a vision. What Christendom doesn't understand is that the resurrected spirit form of the Messiah has the power to appear in the form of a fleshly body to his disciples."

Of course we can explain it, but you need to have ears to listen. What they believe is exactly what the Jehovah's Witnesses cult teaches. The Messiah was indeed flesh and bone after the resurrection because he said so. He resurrected in a body. Luke 24:39 "Behold My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have." in other words He was not Spirit. What they don't understand is the nature of the new body. Their understanding is no different than some of the apostles at first. To deny this is to deny the clear teaching of the Bible and the gospel as well.
John 20:25-28: "The other disciples therefore said to him, "We have seen the Lord." So he said to them, "Unless I see in His hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe." And after eight days His disciples were again inside, and Thomas with them. Jesus came, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, "Peace to you!" Then He said to Thomas, "Reach your finger here, and look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing."   And Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!"
He then commends Thomas for what, believing He is a Spirit? Of course not, but for believing He actually came back physically to life. That's what a resurrection is. Otherwise you need to call it something else. Jesus was raised in a physical body that was the firstfruits of the new man- having a spiritually dominated that can never die again and is not sustained by food or water.

In fact early in church history Irenaeus fought against the Gnostics in his writings and debates, he wrote of Marcion making numerous changes found in Luke. For example “And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet” (Luke 24:40) was be omitted by Marcion. For he did not believe in the physical resurrection of Jesus but only in a spiritual resurrection. So those who deny the physical resurrection and replace it with a spiritual one get their doctrine from this early teacher of heresy.

Acts 1:11 states he will come the same way he left seen physically with the eyes not in a vision. It seems everyone must have a vision to understand what their founder did, even if it is false according to the Scriptures.

Heb.10:12 says Yeshua is a man interceding as well (1 Tim.2:15 and Rom. 8:34).  He is a man sitting at the right hand showing He was raised in His flesh. Acts 4:10 Acts 2:24 "Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death." What dies? The body, that is what needs to be raised to have a real resurrection, no one was raised a Spirit. All resurrections in the Scriptures are physical? Did not Lazarus come back in his same body? What of Jairus daughter? She did not come back a spirit creature. Why would Jesus' resurrection be different than all the examples in the Bible? Every resurrection in the bible is a physical one. If Jesus did not rise from the grave in a physical body then what is the significance of an empty tomb? Why would the disciples run to the tomb to investigate the report of his resurrection if they did not believe in a bodily resurrection ? Why does Paul use Jesus' resurrection as the prototype for all Christians? It is Jesus himself that declares his resurrection. Rev 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, Rev 1:18 "I am He who lives, and was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore. Amen. " The same I is the one who incarnated in the flesh. Rev 2:8 "And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write, 'These things says the First and the Last, who was dead, and came to life." (go to> article on the resurrection about the Jehovah's Witnesses, the same arguments are used by them).

1 Cor.15:1-4: Paul presents the gospel that He preached.  The 3rd point of the Gospel is a real resurrection, which if denied is not accepting the gospel to be saved. So one can have all kinds of visions and dreams but if they contradict the Scripture its all for nothing, a lie.
Rom 10:9: " that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved." If it is not a physical resurrection then Jesus was not raised.

Here's a real revelation for those who doubt this, Acts 2:32:  "This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses." (I would recommend to study further these Scriptures Acts 3:15,16; 5:30.)

2 John 1:7: "For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist." In this epistle John uses the present tense in Greek which focuses specifically on the future coming of the Lord. People who deny that Jesus rose in the flesh or is not coming back in the flesh. by saying he rose or is coming back as a Spirit or in some other form other than his body, are of the spirit of anti-Christ (This not my opinion that is Scripture). In other words he came in the flesh and rose in the same flesh, yet it was transformed to an eternal flesh body. (go to 2nd article)


Kinley states, "That the religious theologians do greatly error in teaching that the Kingdom of Yahweh is to be literally, or physically established on this earth plane, because the Kingdom does not come by observation but is within you (Luke 17:20-21)"

This is half true as far as the spiritual kingdom but there is a literal kingdom that Christ will one day rule in person.

"That Moses was shown a vision of a rerun of the creation of heaven and earth (the greater and more perfect Tabernacle of the Universe) in Mount Sinai, the six days the cloud covered the Mount (Ex. 24:16). This vision was recorded in the first chapter of Genesis. In the beginning of Moses' vision not the beginning of the creation. Elohim created the heaven and earth." Nowhere does it say he had a vision , it states God spoke and he wrote it down. Sound and number assimilation's are consistently found where there is no correlation and then made into doctrine.

They teach that, "Dr. Kinley, himself, knew when the day would come despite what one might read in the bible that no man knoweth the day or hour (Mt.24:36 , Mk.13:32)." (From the booklet Elohim the archetype (original) pattern of the universe P.7) Message from Robert Harris MD is international dean and vice.Pres.

Jesus said NO MAN would know, only his Father, so they put him as an equal to the creator on this. They teach "since the end is declared from the beginning then know that the creation did not come forth in the realm of time, but in the realm of eternity. We have always existed in the day or realm of eternity but it should be quite plain and evident now, since there is no more time left."

Creation is not birthed in eternity for the very reason it says 6 days God created and the 7th day rested which certainly means time. Some have said Kinley by his calculations also taught the world would end in 1996, this certainly seems to be the case. Gary Mathess in the booklet Elohim the archtype (original pattern )of the Universe p.5 rationalizes this by stating that many members were disillusioned when 1995 passed to 1996. That many preached this present system of things would end. That God was merciful because he knew they were not ready to be translated into the kingdom so the age did not end. So in other words it dependent on their readiness for the kingdom to come. Its unfortunate that a false prophesy is what it would take for the members to come out from under this mans teachings. Since just about everything of the Scripture is shaded or unrecognizable.

From this concept of the spiritual first they come up with "when He made a physical man (Adam) in His likeness and image (Gen. 1: 26-27). he also must be masculine and feminine (Gen. 5:1-2), so EVE was in Adam when he was created. "(Book-Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh) If one reads Genesis 2:21-23 in its context Eve did not exist until she was a created from Adams bone. Just as Adam did not exist in the dirt until God formed him and breathed life into him.

Mixing up the terms

They continually mix literal with non literal meanings for example, when one reads in the Bible"… that Yahweh-Elohim (God) made man (Adam) in His likeness and image (Gen. 1:26-27), then we must look to the physical body for all the evidence that we need to know and to understand our Heavenly Father…. the physical proof of the True name of our Heavenly Father within and upon our physical bodies,"( Book-Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh p.3)

Their logic is like this, since inventors and creators have always placed their name, trademark or patent number in some conspicuous place upon what they made so did God, right on your face. So it is a physical image we were created in, God then is the archetype looking like a man.

God's name is on your Face

"Firstly, let us consider the name YAHWEH which begins with the 25th letter of our English alphabet which is Y. There is a definite significance to this letter Y… it has a main root or stem with two branches originating there from. This main root or stem represents Yahweh, Himself, who is Pure Spirit, the Ultimate Source and Substance of all things. One branch represents Elohim (God) who is Yahweh in a Super Incorporeal Shape and Form seen only in a Divine Vision and understood by a Divine Revelation and who created the Heavens and the Earth (Gen. 1:1, John 1:1, Col. 1:15-17), and the other branch represents Yahshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ) who was Yahweh manifested in a physical body."    ( Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh p.4)

"Can we, therefore, find this letter Y in the conspicuous parts of our physical body, namely the hands and face? Why sure we can, for it has been before our eyes all the days of our lives but we have overlooked it and paid it no heed, not realizing the significance of it. Take a look at the palms of your hands and see if you do not see two Y’s there! oh, you say, it looks like an M the thirteenth letter of our alphabet and thirteen is said to be bad luck! Yes, it is bad luck if you do not turn your palm around and see that there are two Y’s which represents Yahweh."(Ibid p.5)

This is just plain superstition, nowhere does the bible warn of the number 13 (unless one wants to spiritualize Rev.13 ) While we translate sounds from Hebrew to English for pronunciation this is not how the letters look in Hebrew. The letter Y in English is not shaped like the yod in Hebrew which they believe is the true language 

Why make this relative to only the English language? Because they started in America. Why would God put a Y in English for his name on everyone’s face before the English language was invented? Think about it! Did we have to wait for the English language to be invented so we can know this special revelation from Dr. Kinley? The fact is they recognize only the Hebrew language yet they MAKE NAME OF GOD IN ENGLISH ON EVERYONE'S FACE, go figure.

.."our facial make-up than the presence of the Y - We all have two eyes:.. What one eye sees, so does the other and they both work together as two witnesses in complete harmony to confirm everything that we visually perceive. one eye represents Elohim, the Super-Incorporeal or Spirit Embodiment of Yahweh, and the other eye represents Yahshua the Messiah or the physical embodiment of Yahweh…. one must have a profound understanding of these two manifestations of Yahweh in order to know our Heavenly Father as He really is, and as He actually exists. These are His two witnesses (Rev.11: 3)." (Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh P.7)

Our eyes are the two witnesses who preach in the streets of Israel and are killed and resurrected! Once one follows the track of new interpretation it can lead them just about anywhere. This is the way Esoterist’s interpret the bible, it has hidden meanings underneath, but all the literal interpretations are rejected for the deeper meanings. This is (docetic) Gnosticism. The letter Y is not Yahweh's name on anyone's face, anymore than the law that was written on tablets of stone is written in us on our two lungs. This is metaphysical nonsense, but for those who have been initiated it actually makes sense.

They use as many Scriptures as possible yanked out of there context to prove their unique position. " Elohim and Yahshua the Messiah whom the Father Yahweh spiritually held in the palm of His hand. The prophet Isaiah wrote, "Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands" (Isa. 49:16), and "I have put my words in thy mouth, and I have covered thee in the shadow of mine hand" (Isa. 51:16) and "Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of Yahweh. and a royal diadem in the hand of thy Elohim." (Isa. 62:3). The prophet Jeremiah also writes, "Therefore behold, I will this once cause them to know, I will cause them to know MINE hand and my might; and they shall know that my name is YAHWEH" (Jer. 16:21). (ibid p. 5-6)

God is called a shield, a buckler, a high tower, a vine, a door, a hen, the Lion of the tribe of Judah his eyes run to and fro upon the earth. Men are called sheep, lambs, salt, branches, and numerous other words. Should we now take these literally also and make a doctrine out of the anthropomorphic statements. Imagine what one can come up with! This is like getting a message from a bowl of alphabet soup.

"We all breathe by means of air entering through our nose which signifies that Yahweh is the Source of all Life (as Moses wrote in Genesis, "And Yahweh-Elohim formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul" Gen. 2:7). If it were not for this breath of life which enters through the nose, man would be lifeless or unconscious and would not have any KNOWLEDGE of his existence. YAHWEH IS Knowledge and Wisdom, Intelligence, Love, etc.. When one has knowledge -- he KNOWS (nose.)" (Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh p.8) They even illustrate a picture of the nose with one side as Yahweh the other side as Elohim and the nostrils as Yahshua.They interpret our facial features saying I (eye) am Elohim, and I (eye) am yashua, and Everyone who knows (nose) this; Has eternal life, abiding in his heart (mouth)." (ibid p.15)

Rev. 22:4 says "They shall see His face, and His name shall be on their foreheads." There would be no meaning to this if everyone has his name on their face already. (notice it says Gods name on their forehead, does this mean they will have a nose on their forehead?) Knowledge is not what we breathe nor is it life, it is something we learn. This is the pantheism of the new age occult view. There are lots of people that have the breath of life that don’t know of Gods existence even with his name on their face! Adam was the only one transferred this life directly so this is not a general example for all. Knows = nose is again playing sound games with words that have nothing relative with each other in meanings. This kind of hermeneutics stinks, unfortunately they don't seem to knowtice.

The name Jesus is Pagan

Playing further semantical games in languages "The stomach is commonly called the BELLY. Is it mere coincidence that BEL (or BAAL) which means LORD is the name of an idol god? The Apostle Saul spoke of such idolatrous and unbelieving worshippers thusly, "Whose end is destruction, whose God is their BELLY, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things" (Philippians 3:19)." But Paul wrote the word belly in Greek not Hebrew or English. I’m sure if one wanted to find words that sound the same they could with the name of Yahweh or God. This is sound assimilation, ignoring the meanings. There are many similar sounding words in languages but they often do not mean the same.

They will use only two versions of the Holy Bible inserting the name in both versions. King James Version or The Holy Name Bible, revised by the late A. B. Traina. This inserts the name without any manuscript verification except their own predilection, much like the Jehovah's Witnesses do for Jehovah. The only thing I can find agreement with is their position that there is no J in the Hebrew language, so it is a Y. Yet they use the English Y to substitute the yod in Hebrew to put God's name on our face. They are consistently illogical.

Their position is that the name "Jesus comes from two pagan deities Ie the Babylonian deity and Zeus of the Greeks. The name evolved… Iazeus, Iesous, Iesus."

"The title Christ is derived from the Hindu idol god Krishna. The ancient Hindus worshipped the sun as a visible representative of the invisible god called Kris. In their religion the idol Krishna was a personification of the sun." (article on Sacred name teachings)

These names have been handed down to us from one generation to another and we took it for granted that the names were right. (Booklet- Scientific Introduction to the Divine Pattern of the Mosaic Tabernacle p.7.)

This is utter nonsense, the writers of the Greek Septuagint who were Jews used these very same words in Greek when translating Hebrew to the Greek  language. Christ was used in the Septuagint by the Hebrews, the very ones who also copied the Hebrew Scriptures they esteem. They now fault them as pagans.

Greek Concordance #2424 Iesous (ee-ay-sooce'); of Hebrew origin [3091]; Jesus (i.e. Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites: KJV—Jesus (Strongs concordance). JESUS iesous ^2424^ is a transliteration of the Heb. "Joshua," meaning "Jehovah is salvation," i. e., "is the Savior," "a common name among the Jews, e. g., <Ex. 17:9; Luke 3:29> (RV); (from Vine's Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words)

In Mt.1:25 it reads from the greek "kai ouk eginoosken auteen heoos hou eteken huion. Kai ekalesen to onoma autou Ieesoun." His name is called Jesus.

This is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Joshua, which originally was Hoshea (Num. 13:8, 16), but was changed by Moses into Yehoshua (Num.13:16; 1 Chron.7:27), or Joshua. After the Exile it assumed the form Jeshua (Heb. Yeshua) or in the Greek , Jesus. This name was given to our Lord to describing his mission to save (Yahweh is salvation) (Matt. 1:21).

The Bible teaches that to know someone’s name is to know something of their character and nature, their person. God has over 70 name which describe his characteristics and attributes (I Am would be the one that consolidates them all, as the eternal existing one, whatever one needs he will be that to them)

"FOR YAHSHUA: the true Hebrew name of Yahshua the Messiah (which is Yahweh's Son manifested in the flesh, the Holy Spirit), the translators have most often substituted the English word - JESUS." (Scientific Introduction to the divine Pattern of the mosaic tabernacle p.7)

"It is said by some that Yahweh is Hebrew and I speak English. This is not true for Yahweh is spelled (Hebrew letters) in Hebrew and is pronounced Yahweh, the exact same way in Hebrew. Yahweh is a transliteration of the Hebrew Tetragrammaton YHVH pronounceable into the English language."( Your physical body is a witness to the name Yahweh)

Almost every other word in Hebrew and Greek can be pronounced in English, for example Moses name is correctly pronounced Moshe. This all proves nothing. One needs to take into account that there are no vowels under the original Hebrew so no one actually knows how to pronounce the name correctly, there can be as many as two dozen variations of Yahweh. The NT was written in Greek as the scripture went out to those who were non Jews by the Jews who wrote it. The very ones who were instructed by the Lord himself.

They teach these are the- CORRECT TITLES AND NAMES

Yahweh-father Elohim-word or son Yashua-Holy Spirit

This is denying the inspiration of scripture. Using this kind of faulty logic their own theology crumbles because Elohim is what God calls other Gods in Exodus 20:3 and Elohim according to them is Jesus. Elohim is not a name per se, it is more a title or description. El singular, im at the end of the word gives it a plural meaning. It does not mean you shall have no other sons or word before me, but no other God's. So there claim is false.

How can Yashua be the Holy Spirit, when this is the name the angel said to call the Son who would be born by the Holy Spirit? This violates the simple and consistent language God spoke to communicate to man.

A few of the primary constitutional objectives of the Institute that need pointing out-

#3. To investigate the unexplained spirit law or so called law of nature, and the powers latent in man. (Rom. 8:1-4, John 1:9)

Do we have latent powers? Only psychics and occultists believe this. This is how Kinley's revelation began.

#9. To make known that Yahweh, from the beginning, ordained there is none other name given among men whereby man can be saved, saving the name of Yahshua the Messiah. (Acts 4:10-12, 1 Tim. 2:5, Phil 2:9-10)

This is what we now identify as the sacred name movement. That unless one calls upon him by the Hebrew pronunciation they cannot be saved. Salvation comes only by knowing and using the "correct" name.

This is superstitious nonsense. First they change the Hebrew language into the English form to prove Gods name is stamped on everyone .Then they claim one must call on God by his correct name to be saved. One would have to be a marathon runner to keep up with the theological trail they bring one on.

The name Yashua instead of Jesus is based on the assumption that the Apostles spoke only Hebrew and that New Testament bible was originally written in Hebrew as the Old Testament was. All the ancient manuscripts are in Greek with other languages coming later centuries later. History shows the Jews were bi and tri lingual so there is no problem in writing in the Greek. The Jews translated the whole Old Testament written in Hebrew to Greek in 250 A.D, called the Septuagint. There are Hebraisms in the Greek New Testament, proving it was the intention of the Jewish authors.

This means one cannot be saved unless they speak his Hebrew name. What about praying to him. Certainly if one is obligated to call upon him in Hebrew they must be able to communicate with him in Hebrew. One cannot say you must use the correct name in Hebrew and ignore what language the Hebrews spoke. What about him speaking to you. Certainly if he requires you to say the correct name to him he would surely speak to you in Hebrew. Paul wrote Rom.10 quoting Joel 2 about calling on his name. He was writing to gentiles who has no knowledge of Hebrew , he did not obligate them this way. And certainly the fact of Iseous which was pronounced in Greek then and our English pronunciation of Jesus is acceptable to God. He is able to know who we are calling on. The bible says that while we are calling on him he is already preparing an answer. He knows what our hearts speech is. So God does not make such a fuss over this. Only a new age prophet does. The New Testament instruction by Jesus himself was to call God Father NOT Yahweh. He rarely called him Yahweh but instead Lord .

They deny the Trinity, the bodily resurrection Lk.24:36-43 Jn.2:19 20:25-27 1 Cor.15:4-8. They also reject water baptism and communion which are New Testament commands, clearly practiced by the Apostles. They are legalistic as they accuse Christians who worship that use the word Lord as actually worshipping Baal because of word assimilation.

They will not use the word Church for themselves but school. And rightly so. God has a Church and Christ is the head of it just as the Scripture says. Theirs is not a Christian Church operating from the biblical teachings, but has every intention of changing Gods former revelation to suit the newer one from their leader Kinley. It all began with a vision. This certainly comes under the heading of Col.3:18: "Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels , intruding into those things which he has seen (visions) intruding into those things which he has seen (visions) vainly puffed up by his own fleshly mind."

go to>IDMR pt.2-Revelation or self realization



wpe26.jpg (961 bytes)



Copyright (c) 2011 No portion of this site is to be copied or used unless kept in its original format in the way it appears. Articles can be reproduced in portions for ones personal use, any other use is to have the permission of the author first. Thank You.

If you would like to Support


We would like to hear from you. Please send us an e- mail and let us know how we can be of  more help. Our time is valuable just as yours is. Please keep in mind, we only have time to answer sincere inquiries. We will use discretion in answering any letters. 

NOTE: we do not accept attachments,  please send the mail viewable in email.